POST 5 Religion Repression or Power Hunger?

Does religion cause war? Or does power cause war? I'll say power does. What do you think? 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PREP 2

     In the article, Burson Fumbles Facebook Flaps, I believe everyone who contribute in misconduct involving Mr. Burson should have done a better job with his Facebook assignment. Instead, he put his reputation and  the two men he hired to help him put put private information about Google. One of them used to work for a network news show. They should not accept Mr. Burson's offer. They should have said "no" to Mr. Burson and stood up for themselves.      Therefore, I think PR clients should always be identified. Even Mr. Burson, who works in public relations, has to agree to some kind of code of conduct. Mr. Burson's answers to the media sparked a debate about how well other PR workers could win consumers' trust. If PR clients are always named, the person receiving the message can decide to accept it. For example, Yelp is a website where you can read reviews of restaurants, businesses, shops, etc. and leave your own. There should be a site that r...
Read more

PREP 4

     In my opinion, OWS was not successful. Success is measured by how far a person, group, or organization's ability to reach their goal. That doesn't mean that OWS cannot be successful, however the status of the OWS movement is still progressing in order to claim being successful.  The Occupy protest movement was designed to expose social and economic inequality in the United States and elsewhere by exposing greed, corruption, and the undue influence of corporations on everyday life. As OWS were able to have succeeded to call out the reputation of a few corporations, they happen to jeopardize their own reputation as well, by creating fake stories to keep consumers on their side.       Therefore, OWS thought they were not succeeding and begun to lie to there audience. This gives me the impression that OWS are hypocrites, and will do the same as the corporations they are fighting against. I would apologize to the people that reputations were ...
Read more

PREP 6

     In my opinion, Scott McClellan is responsible for being ethically irresponsible to his former boss and the White House organization. Even if he spoke up about the secreted things that Bush and the White House has done. He mainly spoke up out of pettiness and selfishness. His intentions was to get back at the people that battered him. If he really wanted to do the best ethical choice, he should've step down from his position and spoke about what was happening when it was happening.       McClellan never considered doing the right thing because he knew it was right either, he did it for money as well. Actions speaks a lot louder than words. McClellan speaking about the things that happened, showed a lot about his character and how he treat his so call friends. He does not treat them the way they want to be treated. 
Read more