PREP 10

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PREP 2

     In the article, Burson Fumbles Facebook Flaps, I believe everyone who contribute in misconduct involving Mr. Burson should have done a better job with his Facebook assignment. Instead, he put his reputation and  the two men he hired to help him put put private information about Google. One of them used to work for a network news show. They should not accept Mr. Burson's offer. They should have said "no" to Mr. Burson and stood up for themselves.      Therefore, I think PR clients should always be identified. Even Mr. Burson, who works in public relations, has to agree to some kind of code of conduct. Mr. Burson's answers to the media sparked a debate about how well other PR workers could win consumers' trust. If PR clients are always named, the person receiving the message can decide to accept it. For example, Yelp is a website where you can read reviews of restaurants, businesses, shops, etc. and leave your own. There should be a site that r...
Read more

PREP 6

     In my opinion, Scott McClellan is responsible for being ethically irresponsible to his former boss and the White House organization. Even if he spoke up about the secreted things that Bush and the White House has done. He mainly spoke up out of pettiness and selfishness. His intentions was to get back at the people that battered him. If he really wanted to do the best ethical choice, he should've step down from his position and spoke about what was happening when it was happening.       McClellan never considered doing the right thing because he knew it was right either, he did it for money as well. Actions speaks a lot louder than words. McClellan speaking about the things that happened, showed a lot about his character and how he treat his so call friends. He does not treat them the way they want to be treated. 
Read more

PREP 9

 MSNBC handled the Romney Wawa moment poorly. They could've had a better article but instead "snipped" it into a completely different and misinterpret the main focus of what was trying to be talked about. If I was Andrea Mitchell I would write another article in his own words explaining MSNBC's point of view and what the point of view was really referring too. This allows both sides to be heard and for the public to have different points of views and opinions to choose from. Instead of just the story MSNBC publish, which tarnishes its reliability. 
Read more